Online dating dangers essay writing
and websites where commentators focus on issues relating to men and masculinity, as a male counterpart to feminism or in opposition to it. Manosphere websites commonly use red pill and blue pill imagery as an analogy; accepting the manosphere's ideology is equated with "taking the red pill", and those who disagree with their philosophy are seen as "blue pilled" or as having "taken the blue pill".
Common topics include the men's rights, fathers' rights, and Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) movements; self-improvement; The manosphere has its own distinct jargon.
Below can be found the review article ‘The Historicity and Historicisation of Arthur’, the first version of which appeared online in 1998.
An up-to-date expansion, development and revision of all the material found here is contained in my (Tempus, 2007). It will, however, continue to be archived at this website, given its long independent existence and the fact that it is itself cited in various publications, such as N. Higham's Many different theories are available as to the 'identity' of Arthur and some brief methodological notes will be found here regarding the making of such identifications.
Many books, articles and web-pages simply make the assumption that there has to be a historical figure behind the Arthurian legends. As anyone at all familiar with medieval literature in general will know, the historicisation of non-historical/mythical personages -- often through association with some important event of the past -- is not in any way an unusual occurrence.While this theory is quite popular it is rightly dismissed by academic commentators as nothing more than 'straws in the wind' (Bromwich , 1991: 6. 113; Hanning, 1995; Padel, 1995) on the grounds that, while Riotamus (or Breton traditions about this figure) could be the (partial) inspiration for Geoffrey's portrayal of Arthur, he has nothing at all in common with the insular traditions of Arthur and thus cannot be the prototype for Arthur as a whole (indeed, he doesn't even have the correct name - Ashe explains this by saying that Riotamus was a title and Arthur was his real name but a recent reviewer (Padel, 1995) has shown this to be untenable).The above means that the historical Arthur, if he existed, will be found in the pre-Galfridian texts and it is to these we must now turn.Ro K writers also criticize the profeminism men's movement and The Good Men Project, arguing that they lead to feminized, passive, weak men who are content to remain on the lowest rungs of the social hierarchy.Weidmann has written a popular online list of rules, "The 16 Commandments of Poon," described by pornographic film director Anna Arrowsmith as reading "like an adolescent list of desires and fears, as though representing two sides of the same coin, spoken by somebody with little or no dating experience".